We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:/fglt/"
(→Changing the format) |
(→Changing the format) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:[http://archive.is/yUSwm Second debate, consensus reached.] --[[User:Ck|Ck]] ([[User talk:Ck|talk]]) 13:40, 22 February 2016 (EST) | :[http://archive.is/yUSwm Second debate, consensus reached.] --[[User:Ck|Ck]] ([[User talk:Ck|talk]]) 13:40, 22 February 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Oh, it's fine then. Got all riled up for no reason. [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 14:48, 22 February 2016 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:48, 22 February 2016
Google Sites?
Calling User:Cptcorax here.
Google Sites? I mean, Google? I don't want /flt/ to be littered with posts like
>google lol botnet
I'm all for improvements, but not anything that can trigger a degradation in post quality. So here's my piece of advice: Move it to a safe (or at least) borderline (controversial, but not meme tier) website.
Script
I've more or less lost all motivation on that script, so if anyone wants to take it, or maybe just remove it, that'd be fine. --Se7en (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2016 (EST)
IRC
You removed the IRC. Some people use it though.--Se7en (talk) 21:19, 9 February 2016 (EST)
Changing the format
If you're going to change the format, TALK about it here first and try to reach a consensus.
— Galactus (talk) 12:55, 22 February 2016 (EST)
- Second debate, consensus reached. --Ck (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2016 (EST)
- Oh, it's fine then. Got all riled up for no reason. — Galactus (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2016 (EST)
