We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Electronic cigarettes"
m (forgot sig) |
m (deletion tag?!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Why a Deletion Candidate? == | == Why a Deletion Candidate? == | ||
Page seems to have enough info. [[User:Mrsnooze|Mrsnooze]] ([[User talk:Mrsnooze|talk]]) 09:30, 24 February 2016 (EST) | Page seems to have enough info. [[User:Mrsnooze|Mrsnooze]] ([[User talk:Mrsnooze|talk]]) 09:30, 24 February 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | * No replies after a month = removing deletion tag. [[User:Mrsnooze|Mrsnooze]] ([[User talk:Mrsnooze|talk]]) 05:43, 23 March 2016 (EDT) | ||
== Nicotine Safety == | == Nicotine Safety == | ||
Revision as of 10:43, 23 March 2016
Why a Deletion Candidate?
Page seems to have enough info. Mrsnooze (talk) 09:30, 24 February 2016 (EST)
Nicotine Safety
Quit fagging up the page, or at least link to a better source than http://www.canadavapes.com/health/nicotine-safety.html. They link to a study that conflates Tobacco with Nicotine. Inhaling nicotine or wearing the patch != smoking tobacco. If you want to do a section on Nicotine Safety, fine, but do it right. Try to approach it neutrally, don't rely on big SCARY bolded side effects lists that are mostly in reference to tobacco smoking, and not nicotine itself. Perhaps try actually reading more than the first section of http://www.gwern.net/Nicotine as well, and you will see that it is quite a balanced take. Muh6trillion (talk) 13:53, 7 February 2014 (EST)
