We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Firefox"
(→To do: - get in here and improve the article, faggots) |
m (→Waterfox) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
[[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 20:09, 7 April 2016 (EDT) | [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 20:09, 7 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I've readded waterfox as I find it commonly used now, and offers more advantages than most other Firefox forks currently. It is currently regularly updated, and not windows specific anymore. --[[User:Owsum|Owsum]] ([[User talk:Owsum|talk]]) 03:39, 17 April 2019 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:39, 17 April 2019
Can we remove policeman? It is indeed nice, but it's NOT updated. — Galactus (talk) 23:21, 27 March 2016 (EDT)
Agent Spoofer
Should we recommend User Agent Switcher? I use Random Agent Spoofer and have found it more efficient and has more features.--Se7en (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
- Now add the icon, I'm not your slave. https://github.com/dillbyrne/random-agent-spoofer/blob/master/data/images/icon_128.png Besides, you didn't even put it in the right place. — Galactus (talk) 15:35, 6 April 2016 (EDT)
To do
Add tags (small image) to denote:
current e10s compatibility- development status
new version of 'slow' to 'active' using the same colour (orange) to remove ambiguity- new tag 'e10s-shimmed'
- improve hinting on all tags
- talk about the WebExtensions API, current status (if you do this, do not forget to mention mozilla plans to expand it in order to accommodate the functionality of existing FF extensions)
— Galactus (talk) 07:27, 21 February 2017 (EST)
Waterfox
Can we remove it? It's rarely updated, wangblows specific, and quite frankly, I don't think anyone uses it OR cares.
— Galactus (talk) 20:09, 7 April 2016 (EDT)
