We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chromium"
Rapespider (talk | contribs) |
(→Chrome Revision History: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I'm not really sure why I maintained it. It was not originally my allusion. I'll change it. [[User:Rapespider|Rapespider]] ([[User talk:Rapespider|talk]]) 20:28, 12 February 2014 (EST) | I'm not really sure why I maintained it. It was not originally my allusion. I'll change it. [[User:Rapespider|Rapespider]] ([[User talk:Rapespider|talk]]) 20:28, 12 February 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Chrome Revision History == | ||
| + | |||
| + | First of all, I think the name change was absolutely retarded. | ||
| + | |||
| + | That being said, what about all the revision history held on the old page. Where'd it go? Is it lost to the ether? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nice job. | ||
Revision as of 05:54, 23 February 2014
If anybody plans to work on a Google Chrome article, feel free to move the Google Chrome content from here to it. Rapespider (talk) 20:21, 12 February 2014 (EST)
What is the point of the HAL 9000 allusion? Chrome doesn't really restrict users any more than Chromium does, it just packs in extra proprietary extensions and some other ways to track usage. It's pretty much the same base browser with the same capabilities, Chrome just ships with some proprietary Google stuff. --Eva-02 (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2014 (EST)
I'm not really sure why I maintained it. It was not originally my allusion. I'll change it. Rapespider (talk) 20:28, 12 February 2014 (EST)
Chrome Revision History
First of all, I think the name change was absolutely retarded.
That being said, what about all the revision history held on the old page. Where'd it go? Is it lost to the ether?
Nice job.
