We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unbound"
(Pinging Chocolate Chip) |
m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 04:33, 8 January 2016 (EST) | [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 04:33, 8 January 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I got the 0.0.0.0 from the website's guide. When I saw that was available, I assumed it would be faster due to host files at zero configs supposedly running faster. --[[User:Chocolate Chip|The One, The Only... Chocolate Chip!]] ([[User talk:Chocolate Chip|talk]]) 23:54, 8 January 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I've emailed NLnet Labs, so I'm going to revert your edit for the time being (partially) until I get a response. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Also, you add plenty of options which are already the default (reason why I didn't include them). [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 03:29, 9 January 2016 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:33, 9 January 2016
Chocolate Chip, I don't believe 0.0.0.0 is faster (this is not a hosts file, after all), but rather represents 'listening on all interfaces' as opposed simply to the localhost. If it does, then that is certainly good to know, but I'd like a source on that.
— Galactus (talk) 04:33, 8 January 2016 (EST)
- I got the 0.0.0.0 from the website's guide. When I saw that was available, I assumed it would be faster due to host files at zero configs supposedly running faster. --The One, The Only... Chocolate Chip! (talk) 23:54, 8 January 2016 (EST)
- I've emailed NLnet Labs, so I'm going to revert your edit for the time being (partially) until I get a response.
- Also, you add plenty of options which are already the default (reason why I didn't include them). — Galactus (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2016 (EST)
