We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Linux/Archive 1"
(Unsigned comment by User:Bisasam) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Does anybody actually use Maui? I think I've only seen it mentioned on /g/ once. [[User:Tibs|Tibs]] ([[User talk:Tibs|talk]]) 05:58, 9 February 2014 (EST) | Does anybody actually use Maui? I think I've only seen it mentioned on /g/ once. [[User:Tibs|Tibs]] ([[User talk:Tibs|talk]]) 05:58, 9 February 2014 (EST) | ||
− | i have never had success with rufus. Win32DI is free software, and easier to use. It has always worked for me, just to let you know. | + | i have never had success with rufus. Win32DI is free software, and easier to use. It has always worked for me, just to let you know. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bisasam|Bisasam]] ([[User talk:Bisasam|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bisasam|contribs]]) 00:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)</span></small> |
Revision as of 02:07, 11 February 2014
openSUSE is not affiliated with RHEL. it is not based on RHEL or Fedora, it uses a completely different package manager, the only similarity is that devs chose to use the .rpm format for packages, instaed of creating their own. they are financially backed(SLE) by RH though. --Bisasam (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2014 (EST)
Does anybody actually use Maui? I think I've only seen it mentioned on /g/ once. Tibs (talk) 05:58, 9 February 2014 (EST)
i have never had success with rufus. Win32DI is free software, and easier to use. It has always worked for me, just to let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bisasam (talk • contribs) 00:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)