We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of recommended OS X software"
m |
m |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:<br>http://s11.postimg.org/dj5e71a83/2016_03_12_at_14_23_38.png <br>[[User:Avocado|— Avocado]] ([[User talk:Avocado|talk]]) 09:25, 12 March 2016 (EST) | :<br>http://s11.postimg.org/dj5e71a83/2016_03_12_at_14_23_38.png <br>[[User:Avocado|— Avocado]] ([[User talk:Avocado|talk]]) 09:25, 12 March 2016 (EST) | ||
| − | ::I didn't mind your other changes, but the 'coding' section triggered me, especially since package managers have got nothing to do | + | ::I didn't mind your other changes, but the 'coding' section triggered me, especially since package managers have got nothing to do with programming. [[User:Galactus|— Galactus]] ([[User talk:Galactus|talk]]) 10:59, 12 March 2016 (EST) |
Revision as of 17:00, 12 March 2016
Still todo:
- More illustrations
- Add additional window management applications
Discussion:
Note to WubTheCaptain:
Moving the Contents to the right doesn't make the page more comprehensible (or more "effective"), it rather seems contraintuitive and impractical. It takes the focus away from the Contents once you enter the page, as well as screwing with the image placement. A (talk) 21:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Just... what?
Do you HONESTLY believe package managers, terminals, and even text editors are subcategories of the 'coding' (oh my god, that fucking word) category?
— Galactus (talk) 06:11, 12 March 2016 (EST)
- Fair enough, that change was shit. I took the word 'Coding' from the GNU/Linux list. I cross-referenced the rec pages, and tried to follow the same format.
Apart from that, the general form is much improved. The Utilities category needs work, and icons need to be added (I removed them temporarily because it was messy - I was working on added the whole page with icons).
Let's work this out. I'll grant you the Coding section, but otherwise I thought it was better.
http://s11.postimg.org/dj5e71a83/2016_03_12_at_14_23_38.png
— Avocado (talk) 09:25, 12 March 2016 (EST)
- I didn't mind your other changes, but the 'coding' section triggered me, especially since package managers have got nothing to do with programming. — Galactus (talk) 10:59, 12 March 2016 (EST)
