We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Falcon Guide"
(Created page with "== LogicalIncrements == Falconguide is no longer being updated to the best of my knowledge, so at the very least the pagename should be changed to LogicalIncrements. I don't t...") |
m (→LogicalIncrements) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== LogicalIncrements == | == LogicalIncrements == | ||
| − | Falconguide is no longer being updated to the best of my knowledge, so at the very least the pagename should be changed to LogicalIncrements. I don't think this website deserves it's own page as it is just a collection of referral links and is no different from any generic hardware "review" website that use this same format of monetization. It could be the case that it does provide the best value, but it could also be the case the author would simply refer to the websites that make him the most money through referrals. It is probably a useful source despite this, but this article is misleading in its current form. | + | Falconguide is no longer being updated to the best of my knowledge, so at the very least the pagename should be changed to LogicalIncrements. I don't think this website deserves it's own page as it is just a collection of referral links and is no different from any generic hardware "review" website that use this same format of monetization. It could be the case that it does provide the best value, but it could also be the case the author would simply refer to the websites that make him the most money through referrals. It is probably a useful source despite this, but this article is misleading in its current form. --[[User:Fogartjo|Fogartjo]] ([[User talk:Fogartjo|talk]]) 09:08, 2 January 2017 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 15:08, 2 January 2017
LogicalIncrements
Falconguide is no longer being updated to the best of my knowledge, so at the very least the pagename should be changed to LogicalIncrements. I don't think this website deserves it's own page as it is just a collection of referral links and is no different from any generic hardware "review" website that use this same format of monetization. It could be the case that it does provide the best value, but it could also be the case the author would simply refer to the websites that make him the most money through referrals. It is probably a useful source despite this, but this article is misleading in its current form. --Fogartjo (talk) 09:08, 2 January 2017 (EST)
