We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Questionable software"
(Created page with "This page isn't informative at all. If you're going to say things are crap, don't just put stuff like "it's crap because I haven't seen anything good come out of it". This is ...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page isn't informative at all. If you're going to say things are crap, don't just put stuff like "it's crap because I haven't seen anything good come out of it". This is subjective crap, and helps no-one.--[[User:Chchjesus|Chchjesus]] ([[User talk:Chchjesus|talk]]) 22:36, 2 February 2014 (EST) | This page isn't informative at all. If you're going to say things are crap, don't just put stuff like "it's crap because I haven't seen anything good come out of it". This is subjective crap, and helps no-one.--[[User:Chchjesus|Chchjesus]] ([[User talk:Chchjesus|talk]]) 22:36, 2 February 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | >All Java software is pure shit I have yet to find any exceptions. | ||
| + | >He never used IntelliJ or other JetBrains products | ||
| + | Still, I agree with ^, this whole page scream of "I don't like it, therefore is shit". I know it's the /g/ attitude, so I won't even complain. [[User:Spittie|Spittie]] ([[User talk:Spittie|talk]]) 23:06, 2 February 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:06, 3 February 2014
This page isn't informative at all. If you're going to say things are crap, don't just put stuff like "it's crap because I haven't seen anything good come out of it". This is subjective crap, and helps no-one.--Chchjesus (talk) 22:36, 2 February 2014 (EST)
>All Java software is pure shit I have yet to find any exceptions. >He never used IntelliJ or other JetBrains products Still, I agree with ^, this whole page scream of "I don't like it, therefore is shit". I know it's the /g/ attitude, so I won't even complain. Spittie (talk) 23:06, 2 February 2014 (EST)
