We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Bisasam"
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
oh and fix the links dude.--[[User:Bisasam|Bisasam]] ([[User talk:Bisasam|talk]]) 05:58, 4 February 2014 (EST) | oh and fix the links dude.--[[User:Bisasam|Bisasam]] ([[User talk:Bisasam|talk]]) 05:58, 4 February 2014 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | At least make the table look more even, and change the lines around it. The spacing looks waaaay off on that table |
Revision as of 12:12, 4 February 2014
Edit war!
So we're having our first head-butting editwar at Recommended software (Windows). My POV - a Micro$hit shill is trying to remove cited information. I assume we have no policies in place for much of anything at this time, so I am inclined to editwar until one of us is told to pike off.
Just bringing it to your attention. Toynbeeidea (talk) 15:14, 31 January 2014 (EST)
My POV: read the article, it doesn't say what that MSE is useless/shit and you shouldn't use it. But anyway, I don't care at all about Windows, so I'll just not edit it anymore. Spittie (talk) 18:08, 31 January 2014 (EST)
since when do we recommend windows or anti-virus software? i will handle this. the next person editing that section will get blocked. --Bisasam (talk) 04:15, 1 February 2014 (EST)
Perhaps the FAQ could be replaced with just a list of popular topics like it was before? Also, I disagree. I think the old design looked ugly and incomplete. --Chchjesus (talk) 04:15, 1 February 2014 (EST)
Yeah, i think we should definitely add the old table back, it was a lot easier to find your way through the pages this way. The black borders were ugly though, but i can fix that. the table will expand when more text is entered so splitting up desktop customization and other edits you did should be fine. --Bisasam (talk) 05:58, 4 February 2014 (EST)
oh and fix the links dude.--Bisasam (talk) 05:58, 4 February 2014 (EST)
At least make the table look more even, and change the lines around it. The spacing looks waaaay off on that table