We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Package manager"
Toynbeeidea (talk | contribs) (Created page with "I thought about adding pacman information, then it occured to me - does this shit need to be in this article? Should usage of individual package managers be moved to thier re...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I thought about adding pacman information, then it occured to me - does this shit need to be in this article? Should usage of individual package managers be moved to thier respective base distro pages? Like, move the apt info to [[Debian]], and then have a pointer in [[Ubuntu]] to that? [[User:Toynbeeidea|Toynbeeidea]] ([[User talk:Toynbeeidea|talk]]) 23:08, 4 February 2014 (EST) | I thought about adding pacman information, then it occured to me - does this shit need to be in this article? Should usage of individual package managers be moved to thier respective base distro pages? Like, move the apt info to [[Debian]], and then have a pointer in [[Ubuntu]] to that? [[User:Toynbeeidea|Toynbeeidea]] ([[User talk:Toynbeeidea|talk]]) 23:08, 4 February 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I Think package manager should have their own page. Aptitude-related information could be in both Debian and Ubuntu, and it would be wasting space/look bad to have repeated information. --[[User:Sergio|Sergio]] ([[User talk:Sergio|talk]]) 11:18, 6 February 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 17:18, 6 February 2014
I thought about adding pacman information, then it occured to me - does this shit need to be in this article? Should usage of individual package managers be moved to thier respective base distro pages? Like, move the apt info to Debian, and then have a pointer in Ubuntu to that? Toynbeeidea (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2014 (EST)
I Think package manager should have their own page. Aptitude-related information could be in both Debian and Ubuntu, and it would be wasting space/look bad to have repeated information. --Sergio (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2014 (EST)
