We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Linux/Archive 1"
(Created page with "openSUSE is not affiliated with RHEL. it is not based on RHEL or Fedora, it uses a completely different package manager, the only similarity is that devs chose to use the .rpm...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
openSUSE is not affiliated with RHEL. it is not based on RHEL or Fedora, it uses a completely different package manager, the only similarity is that devs chose to use the .rpm format for packages, instaed of creating their own. they are financially backed(SLE) by RH though. --[[User:Bisasam|Bisasam]] ([[User talk:Bisasam|talk]]) 12:32, 28 January 2014 (EST) | openSUSE is not affiliated with RHEL. it is not based on RHEL or Fedora, it uses a completely different package manager, the only similarity is that devs chose to use the .rpm format for packages, instaed of creating their own. they are financially backed(SLE) by RH though. --[[User:Bisasam|Bisasam]] ([[User talk:Bisasam|talk]]) 12:32, 28 January 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does anybody actually use Maui? I think I've only seen it mentioned on /g/ once. [[User:Tibs|Tibs]] ([[User talk:Tibs|talk]]) 05:58, 9 February 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 11:58, 9 February 2014
openSUSE is not affiliated with RHEL. it is not based on RHEL or Fedora, it uses a completely different package manager, the only similarity is that devs chose to use the .rpm format for packages, instaed of creating their own. they are financially backed(SLE) by RH though. --Bisasam (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2014 (EST)
Does anybody actually use Maui? I think I've only seen it mentioned on /g/ once. Tibs (talk) 05:58, 9 February 2014 (EST)
