|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | >Look, I don't want to start an edit war here
| |
| − | You just did, I declare a GNU/Jihad.
| |
| | | | |
| − | >Google and Facebook are proper nouns. That means they should be capitalised.
| |
| − | I feel like capitalising them give these things respect, when they deserve none. Fine, I won't change these words as you asked me.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | >"Free" software and (free) "Open Source" software have different meanings.
| |
| − | Oh, we got here an "open source" infidel.
| |
| − | No, not one person or business has called gratis, proprietary software, "free software" - they say "freeware", "for free", or "it's free" - any readers will very quickly learn what free software means even if they misunderstand it at first.
| |
| − | "open source" is a much worse term, as it's as confusing as hell. The only natural meaning is; "you can look at the source code", so that's what almost all people take it to mean.
| |
| − | Good luck explaining the 10 "open source" requirements to someone and having them remember it - in most cases they'll go away with; "you can look at the source code".
| |
| − | It is high heresy to refer to free software licensed under the GPLv{2,3}, expat, ISC, BSD {0,1,2,3}-clause as "open source".
| |
| − | Anyway, it's simply wrong to label software licensed under the GPLv{2,3} as "open source", as "open source" is not written in the license - "free software" is.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | My future edits with have links to sources.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | >And please read articles before you edit them.
| |
| − | How else did I edit them without reading them? [[User:GNUadeen|GNUadeen]] ([[User talk:GNUadeen|talk]]) 09:30, 10 May 2022 (CEST)
| |
