We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Linux (kernel)"
m |
(Run on sentences.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Oh please, why so serious? This article should either be the huge quote, talking about the kernel itself, or preferably a combination starting with the quote. --[[User:Biohazard|Biohazard]] ([[User talk:Biohazard|talk]]) 13:15, 28 January 2014 (EST) | Oh please, why so serious? This article should either be the huge quote, talking about the kernel itself, or preferably a combination starting with the quote. --[[User:Biohazard|Biohazard]] ([[User talk:Biohazard|talk]]) 13:15, 28 January 2014 (EST) | ||
| − | Just having a quote from Stallman does not an article make. I agree with talking about the kernel itself but I doubt we're that far along in fleshing out what this wiki should be | + | Just having a quote from Stallman does not an article make. I agree with talking about the kernel itself but I doubt we're that far along in fleshing out what this wiki should be. I doubt it will ever be a technical manual. --[[User:Gutsman|Gutsman]] ([[User talk:Gutsman|talk]]) 13:20, 28 January 2014 (EST) |
Revision as of 19:20, 28 January 2014
Oh please, why so serious? This article should either be the huge quote, talking about the kernel itself, or preferably a combination starting with the quote. --Biohazard (talk) 13:15, 28 January 2014 (EST)
Just having a quote from Stallman does not an article make. I agree with talking about the kernel itself but I doubt we're that far along in fleshing out what this wiki should be. I doubt it will ever be a technical manual. --Gutsman (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2014 (EST)
