We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Web browsers"
m (Posing a question) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought this wiki would be more for /g/'s opinion on things so that a new user could come here instead of asking us "WHAT IS /g/S FAVORITE DRAGON DILDO PLZ RESPOND". Having IE and the decision that it sucks and rationale behind it would be warranted. --[[User:Gutsman|Gutsman]] ([[User talk:Gutsman|talk]]) 16:46, 28 January 2014 (EST) | Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought this wiki would be more for /g/'s opinion on things so that a new user could come here instead of asking us "WHAT IS /g/S FAVORITE DRAGON DILDO PLZ RESPOND". Having IE and the decision that it sucks and rationale behind it would be warranted. --[[User:Gutsman|Gutsman]] ([[User talk:Gutsman|talk]]) 16:46, 28 January 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think it's ''supposed'' to be a tome of knowledge. I assumed it was okay to add bits of obvious humor. --[[User:Sergio|Sergio]] ([[User talk:Sergio|talk]]) 16:49, 28 January 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:49, 28 January 2014
Chrome is still a lot less customiseable than firefox. Nobody should use IE and dont think it should be on this list, as it does not run on GNU/Linux --Bisasam (talk) 20:39, 27 January 2014 (EST)
This is a /g/-approved website, and as such it is comedic and universal in its approaches. Things like IE should be added because they can be hated on, which 4chan loves to do. I also don't think we should include Linux-only topics. --Fontain (talk) 16:06, 28 January 2014 (EST)
Why shouldn't there be (GNU+)Linux only topics? There are already Windows only topics. --Sergio (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2014 (EST)
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought this wiki would be more for /g/'s opinion on things so that a new user could come here instead of asking us "WHAT IS /g/S FAVORITE DRAGON DILDO PLZ RESPOND". Having IE and the decision that it sucks and rationale behind it would be warranted. --Gutsman (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2014 (EST)
I think it's supposed to be a tome of knowledge. I assumed it was okay to add bits of obvious humor. --Sergio (talk) 16:49, 28 January 2014 (EST)
