We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Talk:Questionable software
This page isn't informative at all. If you're going to say things are crap, don't just put stuff like "it's crap because I haven't seen anything good come out of it". This is subjective crap, and helps no-one.--Chchjesus (talk) 22:36, 2 February 2014 (EST)
>All Java software is pure shit I have yet to find any exceptions.
>He never used IntelliJ or other JetBrains products
Still, I agree with ^, this whole page scream of "I don't like it, therefore is shit". I know it's the /g/ attitude, so I won't even complain. Spittie (talk) 23:06, 2 February 2014 (EST)
I'm a bit ambivalent. On the one hand, the only rule/guideline we have is the current /g/ sticky, which says "/g/ is NOT your personal tech support team or personal consumer review site." On the other hand, we have several pages specifically recommending software, and this page is just the opposite of that. I think, perhaps, the definition of "Pure Shit" should be tightened up a bit though, as Arch is clearly contentious. Myself, I'm keeping out of this for now (as I post from a Manjaro laptop) Toynbeeidea (talk) 08:11, 3 February 2014 (EST)
