We are still actively working on the spam issue.

Difference between revisions of "InstallGentoo Wiki:General rules"

From InstallGentoo Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Uh, what is an infraction notice?)
(Major change to rules, some "rules" are guides, not rules)
 
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div style=" background:#f9f9f9; text-align:center; font-size:95%; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">
 
<div style=" background:#f9f9f9; text-align:center; font-size:95%; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">
Please note that the guide is an '''official policy''', which serves as a guiding rule for the wiki's activities, and as such, this page is subject to constant improvements. However, due to the nature of communities involved, some of our rules may not be suitable, and the community can make suggestions by utilizing the [[InstallGentoo Wiki talk:Guide to editing this wiki|talk page]]. Because of the mechanism of MediaWiki ([[Special:RecentChanges]]), we won't have to announce any addition/deletion to the rules.
+
Please note that the guide is an '''official policy''', which serves as a guiding rule for the wiki's activities, and as such, this page is subject to constant improvements. However, due to the nature of communities involved, some of our rules may not be suitable, and the community can make suggestions by utilizing the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]]. Because of the mechanism of MediaWiki ([[Special:RecentChanges]]), we won't have to announce any addition/deletion to the rules.
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Welcome! Here's a simple guide to help you create a great article!
+
<div style=" background:#f9f9f9; text-align:center; border:1px solid #a3bfb1; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">
 +
This, along with [[IG:TERMS]], are official policies of this wiki and must be followed at all times as long as you are using this service.
 +
</div>
  
==What should my article be about?==
+
This is the official rules of the wiki.
 +
 
 +
== The article must be related to technology==
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:ABOUT]]</small>
 
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:ABOUT]]</small>
Line 12: Line 16:
  
 
If, on a technology board, different people will ask the same things, or you've felt at some time or another that there should have been a guide for something, then you have pretty good indication that there should be an article on it.
 
If, on a technology board, different people will ask the same things, or you've felt at some time or another that there should have been a guide for something, then you have pretty good indication that there should be an article on it.
 
==How should I write my article?==
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:WRITE]]</small>
 
|}
 
I'm glad you asked. Your article should be informative, and the main things people will be looking for when browsing this wiki are:
 
* What is (insert topic here)?
 
* Why should I use (insert topic here)?
 
* How do I use (insert topic here)?
 
* Where can I get (insert topic here)?
 
and last but not least
 
* What (insert topic here) does /g/ use or recommend?
 
 
These are the questions you should try to answer while writing your article.
 
  
 
===Don't mislead people into false information===
 
===Don't mislead people into false information===
Line 39: Line 29:
 
Avoid these words in a page: '''I''', '''we''', '''our''', etc. Always use third-person remarks on any article. For guides, then you can use '''second-person''' remarks. However, you can use first-person remarks for section and sub-section titles (such as [[IG:WRITE|How should I write my article?]]).
 
Avoid these words in a page: '''I''', '''we''', '''our''', etc. Always use third-person remarks on any article. For guides, then you can use '''second-person''' remarks. However, you can use first-person remarks for section and sub-section titles (such as [[IG:WRITE|How should I write my article?]]).
  
This rule does '''NOT''' affect the talk page and user page.
+
{{Note|This rule does '''NOT''' affect the talk page and user page.}}
  
 
===Don't shitpost with your own opinion unless you've got proof===
 
===Don't shitpost with your own opinion unless you've got proof===
Line 50: Line 40:
 
   anything good come out of it. It's a waste of time too, so don't use it.
 
   anything good come out of it. It's a waste of time too, so don't use it.
  
===Do not add humor/false statements to your article===
+
== Neutrality ==
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:HUMOR]]</small>
 
|}
 
Again, don't shitpost with your shitty sense of humor/ideas.
 
 
 
  Edward Snowden is a weeaboo and the savior of /g/ and /tech/. He is the god of free software.
 
  Ever since he whistleblew, /g/ worships him. He is life!
 
 
 
This, along with shitposting without proof, are examples of what you should '''NOT''' do. People check out this wiki to become informed; not to have other peoples' unresearched opinions shoved down their throats. Just because you see people on /g/ act like this, does not mean you should write articles like this.
 
 
 
===Place the contents properly===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:PROPER]]</small>
 
|}
 
Remember, make sure that when you make an article, place the contents properly, for example:
 
*See also is always placed at the very bottom.
 
*External links is always placed before See also.
 
*If possible, put History first.
 
 
 
==Reversion==
 
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:REVERT]]</small>
+
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:NEUTRAL]]</small>
 
|}
 
|}
Try to avoid reverting someone's edits when possible. If a revert is necessary give a rationale for it on the article's talk page, or give a reason with a factual basis on the summary. Calmly explain your reasoning. Try to be factual, site reliable sources and come to a consensus or compromise in disputes. Ask for a third opinion and request for comments if necessary. As a last resort ask a wiki admin to resolve the dispute. Use the three-reverts in 24-hours rule with exemption for vandalism. Do not engage in edit wars.
 
 
=== Three revert rule ===
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:3RR]]</small>
 
|}
 
'''Please note that this is the rule of reversion (aka undoing other editors' action), NOT rule of editing.'''
 
 
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. See below for exemptions.
 
 
The three-revert rule applies per person, not per account; reverts made by multiple accounts operated by one editor count together. Editors violating 3RR will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident. Even without a 3RR violation, an administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may report edit warring with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times.
 
 
If an editor violates 3RR by mistake, they should reverse their own most recent reversion. Administrators may take this into account and decide not to block in such cases—for example if the user is not a habitual edit warrior and is genuinely trying to rectify their own mistake.
 
 
'''3RR exemptions'''
 
 
The following actions are not counted as reverts for the purposes of 3RR:
 
 
# Reverting your own actions ("self-reverting").
 
# Reverting edits to pages in your own user space.
 
# Reverting actions performed by banned users, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users.
 
# Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking.
 
# Removal of clear copyright violations.
 
# Removal of other content that is clearly illegal under US law, such as child pornography and links to pirated software.
 
# Removal of libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced contentious material.
 
  
Considerable leeway is also given to editors reverting to maintain the quality of a featured article while it appears on the main page.
+
All articles must be written from a neutral point of view, which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.
  
If you are claiming an exemption, make sure there is a clearly visible edit summary or separate section of the talk page that explains the exemption. When in doubt, do not revert. Instead, engage in dispute resolution, and in particular ask for help to administrators.
+
Achieving what the community understands as neutrality means carefully and critically analyzing a variety of reliable sources and then attempting to convey to the reader the information contained in them fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without editorial bias. The wiki aims to '''describe disputes, but not engage in them''' (Remember, while the nature of /g/, /tech/ and other relevant boards are full of opinions, this wiki is aimed to give proper information without bias). Editors, while naturally having their own points of view, should strive in good faith to provide complete information, and not to promote one particular point of view over another. As such, the neutral point of view does not mean exclusion of certain points of view, but including all verifiable points of view which have sufficient due weight. Observe the following principles to achieve the level of neutrality that is appropriate:
  
== Replying to comments in Talk pages ==
+
*Avoid stating opinions as facts. Usually, articles will contain information about the significant opinions that have been expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in the wiki's voice. Rather, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources, or where justified, described as widespread views, etc. For example, an article should not state that "genocide is an evil action", but it may state that "genocide has been described by John X as the epitome of human evil."
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
+
*Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts. If different reliable sources make conflicting assertions about a matter, treat these assertions as opinions rather than facts, and do not present them as direct statements.
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:TALK]]</small>
+
*Avoid stating facts as opinions. Uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertions made by reliable sources should normally be directly stated in The Wiki's voice. Unless a topic specifically deals with a disagreement over otherwise uncontested information, there is no need for specific attribution for the assertion, although it is helpful to add a reference link to the source in support of verifiability. Further, the passage should not be worded in any way that makes it appear to be contested.
|}
+
*Prefer nonjudgmental language. A neutral point of view neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject (or what reliable sources say about the subject), although this must sometimes be balanced against clarity. Present opinions and conflicting findings in a disinterested tone. Do not editorialize. When editorial bias towards one particular point of view can be detected the article needs to be fixed.
Be sure to indent your reply and place it below the parent as well as signing using <samp><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></samp> . Example:
+
*Indicate the relative prominence of opposing views. Ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view.
<pre><nowiki>
 
Comment on talk page. ~~~~
 
: Reply to comment on talk page. ~~~~
 
:: Reply to first reply of comment on talk page. ~~~~
 
: Another reply to comment on talk page. ~~~~
 
</nowiki></pre>
 
  
Remember, talk pages are not a place for '''tech support'''.
+
{{Warning|Bias tendency, while mostly harmless, can lead to a breach of [[IG:FALSE]], which may result in a ban.}}
 +
{{Note|This rule does '''not''' affect user pages, which is your own user space, and talk pages, which [[Help:Discussion|discusses]] these kind of things.}}
  
==Capitalization==
+
==How should I edit my article?==
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
+
See [[Help:Editing]] and [[Help:Style]].
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:CAPS]]</small>
 
|}
 
When you make an article, use proper capitalization for page title and section title. '''Do not capitalize the second or subsequent words in an article title, unless the title is a proper name.''' For multiword page titles, one should leave the second and subsequent words in lowercase unless the title phrase is a proper name that would always occur capitalized, even in the middle of a sentence.
 
  
==Sections==
+
==User space==
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:SECTION]]</small>
+
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:USERSPACE]]</small>
 
|}
 
|}
All wiki page sections must begin with <code>==</code>, '''never''' use <code>=</code> for sections.
+
A '''userspace''' is basically your own page with its '''subpages''', which has the prefix '''User:'''. This is your own personal space, you can write absolutely anything, as long as you do '''NOT''' break [[IG:TERMS]], while it is encouraged to follow [[Help:Editing]] and [[Help:Style]] as your guide, it is not required because it's your <s>safe</s>user space.
  
This is a good example: <code>== Sections ==</code>
+
Keep in mind that you can only edit ''your'' own user ('''NOT''' user talk) page. Do '''NOT''' edit others' user page without their explicit permission.
  
and this is a bad one: <code>= Sections =</code>
+
{{Note|Your user space is '''not''' your personal sandbox. Use the [[Sandbox]] page if you want to test something.}}
  
Subsections will begin from <code>===</code>.
+
== Vandalism ==
 
 
==Redirection==
 
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:REDIRECT]]</small>
+
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:VANDALS]]</small>
 
|}
 
|}
To redirect, use the <code><nowiki>#REDIRECT [[Page name#Section title]]</nowiki></code> syntax.
 
 
==Using <nowiki><code></nowiki> and <nowiki><pre></nowiki>==
 
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; "
 
| <small>Shortcut: [[IG:CODEPRE]]</small>
 
|}
 
To use <nowiki><code></nowiki> tag, make sure it is for command/one-line snippets, and not for long ass codes/configuration files.
 
 
<pre>
 
To speed up your system, run <code>yes</code> on your terminal.
 
</pre>
 
 
This would be the result:
 
 
To speed up your system, run <code>yes</code> on your terminal.
 
 
---------------
 
 
To use <nowiki><pre></nowiki> tag, make sure it is for codes, configuration files, etc.
 
 
You can view the example by viewing the source.
 
  
<pre>
+
What constitutes vandalism are including the following, but not limited to:
#include <stdio.h>
+
# Blanking any articles
 
+
# Moving any page without any good reason
int main()
+
# Deleting or editing the contents of '''other users'''' comments on a talk page
{
+
# [[IG:USERSPACE]] violation
  char string[] = "Hello World";
+
# Spambotting
  printf("%s\n", string);
+
# Edit-warring
  return 0;
 
}
 
</pre>
 
  
 
==Rule enforcement==
 
==Rule enforcement==
Line 178: Line 89:
 
|}
 
|}
 
The rules may or may not result in a ban, as such, it depends on the severity of the pages affected.
 
The rules may or may not result in a ban, as such, it depends on the severity of the pages affected.
* Poor editing ([[IG:FIRSTPERSON]], [[IG:PROPER]], [[IG:CODEPRE]], [[IG:SECTION]], [[IG:CAPS]] etc.) will never result in a ban. But a breach to these rules must be fixed at once, by admins or users.
+
* Poor editing (not adhering to [[Help:Editing]] and [[Help:Style]]) will never result in a notice or a ban. But a breach to these guides must be fixed at once to preserve consistency, by admins or users.
* Breaking [[IG:HUMOR]] will result in:
+
* [[IG:ABOUT]] violation:
** First time: First-degree infraction notice
+
** First time: Deletion of article
** Second time: Second-degree infraction notice
+
** Second time: Deletion of article (and banning of involved user)
** n-th time, n > 2: <code>24 * (n - 2)</code>-hour ban.
+
* [[IG:FALSE]] violation:
** 10th time: Permanent ban.
+
** First time: Banning of involved user
* Breaking [[IG:NOPROOF]] will result in:
+
** Second time: Banning of involved user '''and disabling users' ability to edit talk page'''
** First time: First and second-degree infraction notice
+
* [[IG:NOPROOF]] violation:
** n-th time, n > 2: <code>24 * (n - 1)</code>-hour ban.
+
** First time: Asking for proof first, from '''reliable sources'''
** 5th time: Permanent ban.
+
** Second time: Banning of involved user
* Breaking [[IG:FALSE]] will result in:
+
** Third time: Banning of involved user '''and disabling users' ability to edit talk page'''
** n-th time, < 3: <code>n</code>-week ban.
+
* [[IG:VANDALS]] violation:
** 3rd time: Permanent ban.
+
** Number 1 and 2 violation:
* Edit warring:
+
*** First time: Reversion of article (and, use the talk page, really)
** The administrator(s) will protect the page, and the warring parties must settle it in its talk page, if impossible, the administrator will study the case and issue a verdict in a maximum timeframe of 24-hours, the punishment(s) may vary.
+
*** Second time: Reversion of article, permanent ban (user will be able to appeal)
* Spamming with gibberish:
+
*** Third time: Permanent ban (No appeal)
** 1st time: Permanent ban.
+
** Number 4 violation:
 +
*** First time: Permanent ban
 +
*** Second time: Permanent ban (No appeal)
 +
** Number 5 violation:
 +
*** Instant ban (I doubt bots will be able to appeal)
 +
** Number 6 violation:
 +
*** Article lockdown, an admin will assess the situation in the talk page of the respective article.
 +
* Breaking [[IG:TERMS]] will result in:
 +
** Termination of your InstallGentoo related service
  
If you are banned already, you can still make another account, '''but''' if the administrators ever discover you in your new account, you'll be banned.
+
If a new punishment method for a rule is issued, that rule will be effective immediately after an administrator edited this section.
 +
 
 +
If you are banned already, you can still make another account, '''but''' if the administrators ever discover you in your new account, you'll be banned '''permanently'''.
  
 
===I know I am wrong, I want to be unbanned!===
 
===I know I am wrong, I want to be unbanned!===
  
Good, while you are banned, you can still log in and edit your own talk page. Use it to appeal your ban. '''Timed ban less than 72 hours can NOT appeal'''.
+
Good, while you are banned, you can still log in and edit your own talk page. Use it to appeal your ban.
 
 
If you abuse your talk page, your talk page will be protected in <code>n</code> month, raising by 1 everytime you abuse your own talk page. When the <n> reached 5, you cannot appeal anymore.
 
 
 
===Uh, what is an infraction notice?===
 
 
 
An infraction notice is a nice information in your user page to show everyone that you are a bad kid. There are two degrees of infraction notice, the first-degree infraction notice, and the second-degree infraction notice. Basically, a second-degree infraction-notice is an extension of the first-degree infraction notice. This type of punishment are stacking, meaning that:
 
 
 
If you are enduring your first-degree notice, and a second-degree notice is issued, the first-degree punishment will be '''paused'''. That means your punishment time is the remaining time for your first-degree punishment + 2 months.
 
 
 
The effects of infraction notice while you have infraction notice(s), lasts for one month if you have first-degree infraction notice, and three months if you have the first and second-degree notice (stacking, 1 month and 2 month).
 
  
If you ever get this type of notice, do '''NOT''' remove the notice until the specified timeframe. Failure to comply means second-degree infraction notice (assuming you have the first-degree infraction notice) or 2-week ban. (second-degree infraction notice).
+
If you abuse your talk page, your talk page will be protected in <code>n</code> month, raising by 1 everytime you abuse your own talk page. When the <code>n</code> reaches 5, you cannot appeal anymore.
  
 
==Anything else?==
 
==Anything else?==

Latest revision as of 05:18, 5 February 2017

Please note that the guide is an official policy, which serves as a guiding rule for the wiki's activities, and as such, this page is subject to constant improvements. However, due to the nature of communities involved, some of our rules may not be suitable, and the community can make suggestions by utilizing the talk page. Because of the mechanism of MediaWiki (Special:RecentChanges), we won't have to announce any addition/deletion to the rules.

This, along with IG:TERMS, are official policies of this wiki and must be followed at all times as long as you are using this service.

This is the official rules of the wiki.

The article must be related to technology

Shortcut: IG:ABOUT

Head on over to https://8ch.net/tech/ and https://boards.4chan.org/g/ and take a look at the threads on there. The stupid questions threads are excellent for topics to write about. You can also find some needed articles on the list on the main page and in the list of wanted pages.

If, on a technology board, different people will ask the same things, or you've felt at some time or another that there should have been a guide for something, then you have pretty good indication that there should be an article on it.

Don't mislead people into false information

Shortcut: IG:FALSE

Remember, assume that everyone visit the wiki to find the right information. Because the administrators are unlikely to cover many topics at once, we cannot verify whether the content is true or not in an instant. Please do NOT mislead people into false information. The admins may ask general threads in corresponding imageboards to check whether your information is legitimate or misleading.

Don't use first-person remarks

Shortcut: IG:FIRSTPERSON

Avoid these words in a page: I, we, our, etc. Always use third-person remarks on any article. For guides, then you can use second-person remarks. However, you can use first-person remarks for section and sub-section titles (such as How should I write my article?).

Note: This rule does NOT affect the talk page and user page.

Don't shitpost with your own opinion unless you've got proof

Shortcut: IG:NOPROOF

Don't shitpost with your own opinion unless you've shown it to be true, and people generally agree with you (even if you have to convince them).

  Arch is a shitty distro that takes ages to set up and is crap because I haven't seen
  anything good come out of it. It's a waste of time too, so don't use it.

Neutrality

Shortcut: IG:NEUTRAL

All articles must be written from a neutral point of view, which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.

Achieving what the community understands as neutrality means carefully and critically analyzing a variety of reliable sources and then attempting to convey to the reader the information contained in them fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without editorial bias. The wiki aims to describe disputes, but not engage in them (Remember, while the nature of /g/, /tech/ and other relevant boards are full of opinions, this wiki is aimed to give proper information without bias). Editors, while naturally having their own points of view, should strive in good faith to provide complete information, and not to promote one particular point of view over another. As such, the neutral point of view does not mean exclusion of certain points of view, but including all verifiable points of view which have sufficient due weight. Observe the following principles to achieve the level of neutrality that is appropriate:

  • Avoid stating opinions as facts. Usually, articles will contain information about the significant opinions that have been expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in the wiki's voice. Rather, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources, or where justified, described as widespread views, etc. For example, an article should not state that "genocide is an evil action", but it may state that "genocide has been described by John X as the epitome of human evil."
  • Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts. If different reliable sources make conflicting assertions about a matter, treat these assertions as opinions rather than facts, and do not present them as direct statements.
  • Avoid stating facts as opinions. Uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertions made by reliable sources should normally be directly stated in The Wiki's voice. Unless a topic specifically deals with a disagreement over otherwise uncontested information, there is no need for specific attribution for the assertion, although it is helpful to add a reference link to the source in support of verifiability. Further, the passage should not be worded in any way that makes it appear to be contested.
  • Prefer nonjudgmental language. A neutral point of view neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject (or what reliable sources say about the subject), although this must sometimes be balanced against clarity. Present opinions and conflicting findings in a disinterested tone. Do not editorialize. When editorial bias towards one particular point of view can be detected the article needs to be fixed.
  • Indicate the relative prominence of opposing views. Ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view.
Warning: Bias tendency, while mostly harmless, can lead to a breach of IG:FALSE, which may result in a ban.
Note: This rule does not affect user pages, which is your own user space, and talk pages, which discusses these kind of things.

How should I edit my article?

See Help:Editing and Help:Style.

User space

Shortcut: IG:USERSPACE

A userspace is basically your own page with its subpages, which has the prefix User:. This is your own personal space, you can write absolutely anything, as long as you do NOT break IG:TERMS, while it is encouraged to follow Help:Editing and Help:Style as your guide, it is not required because it's your safeuser space.

Keep in mind that you can only edit your own user (NOT user talk) page. Do NOT edit others' user page without their explicit permission.

Note: Your user space is not your personal sandbox. Use the Sandbox page if you want to test something.

Vandalism

Shortcut: IG:VANDALS

What constitutes vandalism are including the following, but not limited to:

  1. Blanking any articles
  2. Moving any page without any good reason
  3. Deleting or editing the contents of other users' comments on a talk page
  4. IG:USERSPACE violation
  5. Spambotting
  6. Edit-warring

Rule enforcement

Shortcut: IG:ENFORCE

The rules may or may not result in a ban, as such, it depends on the severity of the pages affected.

  • Poor editing (not adhering to Help:Editing and Help:Style) will never result in a notice or a ban. But a breach to these guides must be fixed at once to preserve consistency, by admins or users.
  • IG:ABOUT violation:
    • First time: Deletion of article
    • Second time: Deletion of article (and banning of involved user)
  • IG:FALSE violation:
    • First time: Banning of involved user
    • Second time: Banning of involved user and disabling users' ability to edit talk page
  • IG:NOPROOF violation:
    • First time: Asking for proof first, from reliable sources
    • Second time: Banning of involved user
    • Third time: Banning of involved user and disabling users' ability to edit talk page
  • IG:VANDALS violation:
    • Number 1 and 2 violation:
      • First time: Reversion of article (and, use the talk page, really)
      • Second time: Reversion of article, permanent ban (user will be able to appeal)
      • Third time: Permanent ban (No appeal)
    • Number 4 violation:
      • First time: Permanent ban
      • Second time: Permanent ban (No appeal)
    • Number 5 violation:
      • Instant ban (I doubt bots will be able to appeal)
    • Number 6 violation:
      • Article lockdown, an admin will assess the situation in the talk page of the respective article.
  • Breaking IG:TERMS will result in:
    • Termination of your InstallGentoo related service

If a new punishment method for a rule is issued, that rule will be effective immediately after an administrator edited this section.

If you are banned already, you can still make another account, but if the administrators ever discover you in your new account, you'll be banned permanently.

I know I am wrong, I want to be unbanned!

Good, while you are banned, you can still log in and edit your own talk page. Use it to appeal your ban.

If you abuse your talk page, your talk page will be protected in n month, raising by 1 everytime you abuse your own talk page. When the n reaches 5, you cannot appeal anymore.

Anything else?

  • Provide examples
  • Use infographics/images if possible
  • Try not to use too much technical jargon unless you explain what it means. Assume that anyone coming looking for a topic here doesn't know anything about it. Your article should be as easy to understand as possible, and as quick to understand as possible.
  • Learn how to spell and use proper grammar.
  • Learn and use the wiki formatting markup here. Nicer looking pages are easier to read.
    • If you find a shitty article, please mark it with the {{Cleanup}} tag.
  • Provide tips and tricks or advice you've learned to make things easier

Now, get out there and start being useful, you swine.