We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:/g/ projects"
(→Needs categories) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
- How about splitting it into active and dormant? Active is likely to be much smaller and much easier to categorize. Deleting shitty forks with no development will probably cut the list down further [[User:Mrsnooze|Mrsnooze]] ([[User talk:Mrsnooze|talk]]) 07:46, 8 April 2015 (EDT) | - How about splitting it into active and dormant? Active is likely to be much smaller and much easier to categorize. Deleting shitty forks with no development will probably cut the list down further [[User:Mrsnooze|Mrsnooze]] ([[User talk:Mrsnooze|talk]]) 07:46, 8 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Splitting would be a good idea, but who will keep watch on all the active projects and move them to dormant? | ||
== Sortable table == | == Sortable table == | ||
I don't know how to do this but the table needs to be sortable. | I don't know how to do this but the table needs to be sortable. | ||
Revision as of 03:05, 11 April 2015
- The /g/ n00b programming projects image would be better off in a beginner's programming section Mrsnooze (talk) 07:49, 8 April 2015 (EDT)
Needs categories
There are too many projects in the list, it's a big mess. They need to be broken down into categories like:
- Mobile
- Misc. desktop software
- IM
- Browser
- OS
- How about splitting it into active and dormant? Active is likely to be much smaller and much easier to categorize. Deleting shitty forks with no development will probably cut the list down further Mrsnooze (talk) 07:46, 8 April 2015 (EDT)
Splitting would be a good idea, but who will keep watch on all the active projects and move them to dormant?
Sortable table
I don't know how to do this but the table needs to be sortable.
