We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chrome"
(Reply to User:Rapespider, suggestion about page redirect and article rename, unsigned comments) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page should be renamed to Chromium and transformed into a page about Chromium. I will add Google Chrome to the questionable software page when I have time. [[User:Rapespider|Rapespider]] ([[User talk:Rapespider|talk]]) 03:59, 6 February 2014 (EST) | This page should be renamed to Chromium and transformed into a page about Chromium. I will add Google Chrome to the questionable software page when I have time. [[User:Rapespider|Rapespider]] ([[User talk:Rapespider|talk]]) 03:59, 6 February 2014 (EST) | ||
:A redirect is in place from [[Chromium]] to a subheader on the article that I made. How about changing the name of this page to [[Google Chrome]]? [[User:WubTheCaptain|WubTheCaptain]] ([[User talk:WubTheCaptain|talk]]) 21:05, 10 February 2014 (EST) | :A redirect is in place from [[Chromium]] to a subheader on the article that I made. How about changing the name of this page to [[Google Chrome]]? [[User:WubTheCaptain|WubTheCaptain]] ([[User talk:WubTheCaptain|talk]]) 21:05, 10 February 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I don't agree. Chrome and Chromium are different applications. If anything, this page should be renamed Chromium and a new Chrome page should be written, detailing the proprietary Google extensions, such as the built-in PDF reader. --[[User:Eva-02|Eva-02]] ([[User talk:Eva-02|talk]]) 08:05, 11 February 2014 (EST) | ||
>40% worldwide usage share of web browsers | >40% worldwide usage share of web browsers | ||
Revision as of 15:05, 11 February 2014
This page should be renamed to Chromium and transformed into a page about Chromium. I will add Google Chrome to the questionable software page when I have time. Rapespider (talk) 03:59, 6 February 2014 (EST)
- A redirect is in place from Chromium to a subheader on the article that I made. How about changing the name of this page to Google Chrome? WubTheCaptain (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2014 (EST)
- I don't agree. Chrome and Chromium are different applications. If anything, this page should be renamed Chromium and a new Chrome page should be written, detailing the proprietary Google extensions, such as the built-in PDF reader. --Eva-02 (talk) 08:05, 11 February 2014 (EST)
>40% worldwide usage share of web browsers >questionable software page top kek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vektartsai (talk • contribs) 10:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
>Windows: ~90% share of operating systems >it's still questionable Very 'kake', indeed — Preceding unsigned comment added by IRIXUser (talk • contribs) 20:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
