We are still actively working on the spam issue.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chrome"

From InstallGentoo Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
: I don't agree. Chrome and Chromium are different applications. If anything, this page should be renamed Chromium and a new Chrome page should be written, detailing the proprietary Google extensions, such as the built-in PDF reader. --[[User:Eva-02|Eva-02]] ([[User talk:Eva-02|talk]]) 08:05, 11 February 2014 (EST)
 
: I don't agree. Chrome and Chromium are different applications. If anything, this page should be renamed Chromium and a new Chrome page should be written, detailing the proprietary Google extensions, such as the built-in PDF reader. --[[User:Eva-02|Eva-02]] ([[User talk:Eva-02|talk]]) 08:05, 11 February 2014 (EST)
 +
::I agree with Eva --[[User:Bisasam|Bisasam]] ([[User talk:Bisasam|talk]]) 09:04, 11 February 2014 (EST)
  
 
>40% worldwide usage share of web browsers
 
>40% worldwide usage share of web browsers

Latest revision as of 15:04, 11 February 2014

This page should be renamed to Chromium and transformed into a page about Chromium. I will add Google Chrome to the questionable software page when I have time. Rapespider (talk) 03:59, 6 February 2014 (EST)

A redirect is in place from Chromium to a subheader on the article that I made. How about changing the name of this page to Google Chrome? WubTheCaptain (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2014 (EST)
I don't agree. Chrome and Chromium are different applications. If anything, this page should be renamed Chromium and a new Chrome page should be written, detailing the proprietary Google extensions, such as the built-in PDF reader. --Eva-02 (talk) 08:05, 11 February 2014 (EST)
I agree with Eva --Bisasam (talk) 09:04, 11 February 2014 (EST)

>40% worldwide usage share of web browsers >questionable software page top kek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vektartsai (talkcontribs) 10:32, 6 February 2014‎ (UTC)

>Windows: ~90% share of operating systems >it's still questionable Very 'kake', indeed — Preceding unsigned comment added by IRIXUser (talkcontribs) 20:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)