We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oracle"
(Created page with "We probably don't need to elaborate upon criticisms of Oracle Inc. and the less than stellar things they may have done to the FLOSS community. This is pretty good as it is. -...") |
(Reply to User:Placebo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We probably don't need to elaborate upon criticisms of Oracle Inc. and the less than stellar things they may have done to the FLOSS community. This is pretty good as it is. --[[User:Placebo|Placebo]] ([[User talk:Placebo|talk]]) 13:28, 17 February 2014 (EST) | We probably don't need to elaborate upon criticisms of Oracle Inc. and the less than stellar things they may have done to the FLOSS community. This is pretty good as it is. --[[User:Placebo|Placebo]] ([[User talk:Placebo|talk]]) 13:28, 17 February 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | :Some expansion on context, such as current maintainer of Java and MySQL their logo where allowed (under fair-use?) would be useful and more helpful for the reader. [[User:WubTheCaptain|WubTheCaptain]] ([[User talk:WubTheCaptain|talk]]) 13:50, 17 February 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 17 February 2014
We probably don't need to elaborate upon criticisms of Oracle Inc. and the less than stellar things they may have done to the FLOSS community. This is pretty good as it is. --Placebo (talk) 13:28, 17 February 2014 (EST)
- Some expansion on context, such as current maintainer of Java and MySQL their logo where allowed (under fair-use?) would be useful and more helpful for the reader. WubTheCaptain (talk) 13:50, 17 February 2014 (EST)
