We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Phone Networks"
(→Issues: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This page is basically useless POV. Especially the whole notion of some US carriers being "generally regarded as safe" or having any meaningful difference in terms of privacy. [[User:Kt6cqzuss4is8e3|Kt6cqzuss4is8e3]] ([[User talk:Kt6cqzuss4is8e3|talk]]) 14:06, 4 October 2016 (EDT) | This page is basically useless POV. Especially the whole notion of some US carriers being "generally regarded as safe" or having any meaningful difference in terms of privacy. [[User:Kt6cqzuss4is8e3|Kt6cqzuss4is8e3]] ([[User talk:Kt6cqzuss4is8e3|talk]]) 14:06, 4 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Idea: move the page to "Phone networks", and expand it into an empirical comparison of networks and prices and shit. LOL who can be arsed XD [[User:Keboler|Keboler]] ([[User talk:Keboler|talk]]) 16:27, 5 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 5 October 2016
Issues
This page is basically useless POV. Especially the whole notion of some US carriers being "generally regarded as safe" or having any meaningful difference in terms of privacy. Kt6cqzuss4is8e3 (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2016 (EDT)
Idea: move the page to "Phone networks", and expand it into an empirical comparison of networks and prices and shit. LOL who can be arsed XD Keboler (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2016 (EDT)
