We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Electronic cigarettes"
(→Why a Deletion Candidate?) |
m (→This has to be outdated: add signature) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Cleanup tag with no reason specified. | Cleanup tag with no reason specified. | ||
The page is basically brand names with no discussion. Is that why the cleanup tag was applied?! | The page is basically brand names with no discussion. Is that why the cleanup tag was applied?! | ||
| + | |||
| + | == This has to be outdated == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The marketplace changes so frequently, I think maintaining this page would require a team. The last updates were to minor ones over a year and a half ago, and before that the most significant edit was 2014. Either delete of maintain, imho. --<span style="color:red;">S</span><span style="color:blue;">e</span><span style="color:green;">7</span><span style="color:purple;">e</span><span style="color:orange;">n</span>(1) ([[User talk:Se7en1|talk]]) 00:00, 31 December 2018 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:00, 31 December 2018
Why a Deletion Candidate?
Page seems to have enough info. Mrsnooze (talk) 09:30, 24 February 2016 (EST)
I added it because I thought that Electronic Cigarettes were irrelevant to a tech wiki--Se7en (talk) 18:08, 23 March 2016 (EDT)
Nicotine Safety
Quit fagging up the page, or at least link to a better source than http://www.canadavapes.com/health/nicotine-safety.html. They link to a study that conflates Tobacco with Nicotine. Inhaling nicotine or wearing the patch != smoking tobacco. If you want to do a section on Nicotine Safety, fine, but do it right. Try to approach it neutrally, don't rely on big SCARY bolded side effects lists that are mostly in reference to tobacco smoking, and not nicotine itself. Perhaps try actually reading more than the first section of http://www.gwern.net/Nicotine as well, and you will see that it is quite a balanced take. Muh6trillion (talk) 13:53, 7 February 2014 (EST)
Cleanup Tag
Cleanup tag with no reason specified. The page is basically brand names with no discussion. Is that why the cleanup tag was applied?!
This has to be outdated
The marketplace changes so frequently, I think maintaining this page would require a team. The last updates were to minor ones over a year and a half ago, and before that the most significant edit was 2014. Either delete of maintain, imho. --Se7en(1) (talk) 00:00, 31 December 2018 (EST)
