We are still actively working on the spam issue.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nanochan"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We can debate what does or doesn't belong in this article, but it's not appropriate to silently replace the link with a third-party clone site that most of the users of the original site want nothing to do with. [[User:Insert|Insert]] ([[User talk:Insert|talk]]) 06:23, 20 March 2023 (CET) | We can debate what does or doesn't belong in this article, but it's not appropriate to silently replace the link with a third-party clone site that most of the users of the original site want nothing to do with. [[User:Insert|Insert]] ([[User talk:Insert|talk]]) 06:23, 20 March 2023 (CET) | ||
:That isn't what it is, though. It's the only remaining instance after a dispute between two rival administrators of the site, of which one has shut his copy down and the other has not. Not "third party" and not a clone either.[[User:Wikiist|Wikiist]] ([[User talk:Wikiist|talk]]) 16:42, 21 March 2023 (CET) | :That isn't what it is, though. It's the only remaining instance after a dispute between two rival administrators of the site, of which one has shut his copy down and the other has not. Not "third party" and not a clone either.[[User:Wikiist|Wikiist]] ([[User talk:Wikiist|talk]]) 16:42, 21 March 2023 (CET) | ||
| + | ::What the fuck is "rival administrator" supposed to mean? Hikari was never an administrator of any sort on nanochan, he was what was known as a "trial volunteer" with less privileges than a 4chan janny. This is the best theory about who runs nanoray as far as I know, although as far as I know there's no proof and it's based on observing his and the nanoray admin's behavior. But there's certainly no evidence that the nanoray admin was ever an admin at nanochan. If you have any proof of something different, show me. In any case, replacing the site link without any indication it is a clone run by a different person with different principles instead of a voluntary transfer is not acceptable. [[User:Insert|Insert]] ([[User talk:Insert|talk]]) 17:26, 21 March 2023 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 18:26, 21 March 2023
We can debate what does or doesn't belong in this article, but it's not appropriate to silently replace the link with a third-party clone site that most of the users of the original site want nothing to do with. Insert (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2023 (CET)
- That isn't what it is, though. It's the only remaining instance after a dispute between two rival administrators of the site, of which one has shut his copy down and the other has not. Not "third party" and not a clone either.Wikiist (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2023 (CET)
- What the fuck is "rival administrator" supposed to mean? Hikari was never an administrator of any sort on nanochan, he was what was known as a "trial volunteer" with less privileges than a 4chan janny. This is the best theory about who runs nanoray as far as I know, although as far as I know there's no proof and it's based on observing his and the nanoray admin's behavior. But there's certainly no evidence that the nanoray admin was ever an admin at nanochan. If you have any proof of something different, show me. In any case, replacing the site link without any indication it is a clone run by a different person with different principles instead of a voluntary transfer is not acceptable. Insert (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2023 (CET)
